Comments for Ivan Frade's Blog http://dz015.wordpress.com GNOME, maemo, books, movies and whatnot Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:34:18 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ Comment on 2 años en 250 palabras. by will http://dz015.wordpress.com/2013/04/25/2-anos-en-un-post/#comment-331 Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:34:18 +0000 http://dz015.wordpress.com/?p=445#comment-331 Que bien Frade! Espero que mantengas vivo el blog y así saber de algo más a menudo.

Un abrazo fuerte y mucha suerte!

]]> Comment on 2 años en 250 palabras. by Sergio http://dz015.wordpress.com/2013/04/25/2-anos-en-un-post/#comment-328 Thu, 25 Apr 2013 07:43:00 +0000 http://dz015.wordpress.com/?p=445#comment-328 como ya te dije, buena suerte amigo!

btw, ¿estas enseñado español a Reetta? a menos los títulos de sus posts son bilingües :-)

]]> Comment on Persepolis (2007) by luc http://dz015.wordpress.com/2011/06/12/persepolis-2007/#comment-288 Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:30:48 +0000 http://dz015.wordpress.com/?p=398#comment-288 Persepolis rocks!
She managed to talk with lot of humour about a dramatic subject.
I went from laugh to tears several times during the projection.

]]> Comment on Tomboy – Tracker integration by Pierre-Yves Luyten http://dz015.wordpress.com/2011/03/09/tomboy-tracker-integration/#comment-286 Fri, 30 Dec 2011 11:30:24 +0000 http://dz015.wordpress.com/?p=234#comment-286 Wow! I should test this soon, the idea is great.

Actually i was wondering if I could “port” tomboy / gnote to be a simple note editor. files with “.note” extension would be just like other files, tagged with tracker. Why having a /home/toto/.local/share/tomboy folder? instead the notes could be put everywhere in the file system and opened from there / tracker-needle / gnome shell or whatever

]]> Comment on Tomboy – Tracker integration by Alexander http://dz015.wordpress.com/2011/03/09/tomboy-tracker-integration/#comment-278 Thu, 20 Oct 2011 18:37:42 +0000 http://dz015.wordpress.com/?p=234#comment-278 I’ve successfully configured your addin but compilation fails. If you know what to do, please help me.
Ubuntu 10.10 (“up to date”)
mono-gmcs 2.6.7-3ubuntu1

me@netbook:~/Downloads/tomboy-tracker$ make
Making all in src
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/me/Downloads/tomboy-tracker/src’
mkdir -p `dirname TrackerAddin.dll` && /usr/bin/gmcs -debug -target:exe -out:TrackerAddin.dll -debug -define:DEBUG -target:library -r:/usr/lib/cli/NDesk.DBus-1.0/NDesk.DBus.dll -r:/usr/lib/tomboy/Tomboy.exe TrackerNoteAddin.cs TrackerClient.cs TrackerIface.cs -resource:./Tracker.addin.xml
error CS0040: Unexpected debug information initialization error `The assembly for default symbol writer cannot be loaded’
Compilation failed: 1 error(s), 0 warnings
make[1]: *** [TrackerAddin.dll] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/me/Downloads/tomboy-tracker/src’
make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1

]]> Comment on The good, the bad and the ugly (or Python, Security FW and Harmattan) by Laszlo Papp http://dz015.wordpress.com/2011/07/05/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-or-python-security-fw-and-harmattan/#comment-273 Thu, 04 Aug 2011 10:40:21 +0000 http://dz015.wordpress.com/?p=409#comment-273 It does not require reflash here. It works as designed, prevents the operation, that is. Which image do you use ?

]]> Comment on The good, the bad and the ugly (or Python, Security FW and Harmattan) by EIPI http://dz015.wordpress.com/2011/07/05/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-or-python-security-fw-and-harmattan/#comment-272 Fri, 29 Jul 2011 01:09:21 +0000 http://dz015.wordpress.com/?p=409#comment-272 Can you use Harmattan Security Framework together with a Python application in a way to store/retrieve API keys on the device in a secure manner? The idea would be that only the application could view and use the API key, and it would not be visible to user/root. If changes to the python scripts does cause a device lockup, then users could not intercept the key. Any thoughts on how to implement such a transaction? Thank you.

]]> Comment on The good, the bad and the ugly (or Python, Security FW and Harmattan) by Marius Gedminas http://dz015.wordpress.com/2011/07/05/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-or-python-security-fw-and-harmattan/#comment-271 Wed, 20 Jul 2011 23:45:19 +0000 http://dz015.wordpress.com/?p=409#comment-271 I agree that it’s reasonable to prevent changes — but bricking the entire device, instead of just forbidding that script from running, seems excessive to me.

]]> Comment on The good, the bad and the ugly (or Python, Security FW and Harmattan) by dz015 http://dz015.wordpress.com/2011/07/05/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-or-python-security-fw-and-harmattan/#comment-268 Fri, 08 Jul 2011 09:35:32 +0000 http://dz015.wordpress.com/?p=409#comment-268 This “integrity check” only affects programs or libraries that request a token to the security FW. Configuration files follow the usual user/group protection in linux. Nothing changes for that.

If the python app doesn’t request any special permission from security FW, you can tweak it as before. If the script makes something sensitive (that requires security supervision), then seems reasonable to prevent uncontrolled changes on it.

]]> Comment on The good, the bad and the ugly (or Python, Security FW and Harmattan) by int_ua http://dz015.wordpress.com/2011/07/05/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-or-python-security-fw-and-harmattan/#comment-267 Fri, 08 Jul 2011 07:25:44 +0000 http://dz015.wordpress.com/?p=409#comment-267 >_<
Does it detects configuration files changes?
What if I needed to tweak some python app? I've done this a couple of times on my N900. And on N950 I will have to copy whole app to the $HOME?

]]>